On the Maximal Number of Independent Circuits in a Graph
نویسندگان
چکیده
In a recent paper [l] K . CORRÁDI and A. HAJNAL proved that if a finite graph without multiple edges contains at least 3k vertices and the valency of every vertex is at least 2k, where k is a positive integer, then the graph contains k independent circuits, i . e . the graph contains as a subgraph a set of k circuits no two of which have a vertex in common . The present paper contains extensions of this theorem. In a recent paper [2] P . ERDŐS and L. PÓSA proved, among other things, that if a finite graph with or without loops and multiple edges contains n vertices and at least n + 4 edges, then the graph contains two circuits without an edge in common . The present paper contains analogous results for planar graphs . We adopt the following notation : O k denotes a graph consisting of k independent circuits, kO denotes a graph consisting of k or more circuits no two of which have an edge in common . If q is a graph then 'V (q) denotes the set of vertices of q, `V i(q ) denotes the set of vertices of q having valency i in q (i being a non-negative integer), T 5 i (q), Ty i (q) denote the set of vertices of 4 having valency i and ' i, respectively, and &(q) denotes the set of edges of c~ . The valency of the vertex x in the graph will be denoted by v (x, C~) . I ? (() I will be denoted by V (q), J & (q) I by E(q) etc. In this notation the theorem Of CORRÁDI and HAJNAL quoted above states that if q is a finite graph without multiple edges and if V(q) 3k and T -2k_ 1 (4) =0, then q Ok ; and the theorem of ERDÖS and PÓSA quoted above states that if is a finite graph and E(C) _V(q) + 4, then qD 2 O .
منابع مشابه
Global Forcing Number for Maximal Matchings under Graph Operations
Let $S= \{e_1,\,e_2, \ldots,\,e_m\}$ be an ordered subset of edges of a connected graph $G$. The edge $S$-representation of an edge set $M\subseteq E(G)$ with respect to $S$ is the vector $r_e(M|S) = (d_1,\,d_2,\ldots,\,d_m)$, where $d_i=1$ if $e_i\in M$ and $d_i=0$ otherwise, for each $i\in\{1,\ldots , k\}$. We say $S$ is a global forcing set for maximal matchings of $G$ if $...
متن کاملMaximal Independent Sets for the Pixel Expansion of Graph Access Structure
Abstract : A visual cryptography scheme based on a given graph G is a method to distribute a secret image among the vertices of G, the participants, so that a subset of participants can recover the secret image if they contain an edge of G, by stacking their shares, otherwise they can obtain no information regarding the secret image. In this paper a maximal independent sets of the graph G was ...
متن کاملMAXIMAL INDEPENDENT SETS FOR THE PIXEL EXPANSION OF GRAPH ACCESS STRUCTURE
Given a graph G, a visual cryptography scheme based on the graph G is a method to distribute a secret image among the vertices of G, the participants, so that a subset of participants can recover the secret image if they contain an edge of G, by stacking their shares, otherwise they can obtain no information regarding the secret image. In this paper we apply maximal independent sets of the grap...
متن کاملSome Results on the Maximal 2-Rainbow Domination Number in Graphs
A 2-rainbow dominating function ( ) of a graph is a function from the vertex set to the set of all subsets of the set such that for any vertex with the condition is fulfilled, where is the open neighborhood of . A maximal 2-rainbow dominating function on a graph is a 2-rainbow dominating function such that the set is not a dominating set of . The weight of a maximal is the value . ...
متن کاملOn the saturation number of graphs
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple connected graph. A matching $M$ in a graph $G$ is a collection of edges of $G$ such that no two edges from $M$ share a vertex. A matching $M$ is maximal if it cannot be extended to a larger matching in $G$. The cardinality of any smallest maximal matching in $G$ is the saturation number of $G$ and is denoted by $s(G)$. In this paper we study the saturation numbe...
متن کاملDifferent-Distance Sets in a Graph
A set of vertices $S$ in a connected graph $G$ is a different-distance set if, for any vertex $w$ outside $S$, no two vertices in $S$ have the same distance to $w$.The lower and upper different-distance number of a graph are the order of a smallest, respectively largest, maximal different-distance set.We prove that a different-distance set induces either a special type of path or an independent...
متن کامل